Sunday, May 1, 2016


May be used as you like
May 01.2016
     Pain is apparently different in the South than the North : South ( of Prince Albert) there is Intolerable Pain and it is discussed forever. In the North we just have pain and we shut up about it.
    Our neighbour Mr. Thomas McKenzie had cancer of the bone for well over ten years. Many times he was on the verge of death yet returned home time and time again. I do not recall him using the phrase Intolerable Pain or anyone else using the phrase about him. However many times people met at his house for prayer and singing. He did not die alone and he had a wake and funeral which extended to two communities at least . He was not abandoned . He has a grave and marker beside Holy Trinity Church in Stanley Mission.

    When Mr. Isaac Charles Sr.was dying ( after falling ill over a flu shot ) many people gathered at the hospital bed in La Ronge. Sometimes they prayed. Sometimes they sat still making sure there was never a time that he was alone. Children, grandchildren, youth crowded in the hall way and waiting room to be with him.

    At Southend and at many other communities people gather at the grave site and make sure that they are personally involved in covering the casket with earth. Even little children take up a handful of dirt and throw it in the grave. Everyone faces the reality of death together Children grow up knowing death and also the dignity that must be accorded to the dying and the dead.

    We  Northerners assume that sickness  brings pain but we assume that is part of the baggage of living.  To escape pain and discomfort is not the ultimate goal in life.. Courage and perseverance is expected . Suicide rips everyone as a terrible demonic monster. Frequency doesn’t nullify the horror.

    When people died in beds either at home or in a hospital  facing a man on a cross they, their family and caregivers could remember there was Someone who had already suffered and died and promised us that death was not the end. Our job was to endure to the end as He had done for us.

      St. Jean de Brebeuf was tortured for at least 12 hours. He rallied his Huron Christians who were also to be burned at the stake. They knew that if they recanted their Faith the Iroquois would let them go. None of them did. One Iroquois insisted on eating the heart of Brebeuf . He wanted the courage of Brebeuf which he saw was superior to that of the Iroquois . He spent the rest of his life spreading the Gospel.

    Now endurance and courage are irrelevant.  Comfort is everything. Whose comfort matters is not necessarily the dying.. One mustn’t be a burden on the tax payer or on family and important schedules. What if someone misses out on a promotion if she sits by her dying mother? !

    In the name of Comfort we let doctors murder and family and dying agree to it. Doesn’t that make you uncomfortable?  Gay

Thursday, April 28, 2016


From: Assisted Living not Assisted Dying Campaign
Contact person: Gay Caswell 306-758-2041

    “There is evidence that Trudeau intends to stop the debate on the Death Bill in a few days. This shows his refusal to operate by parliamentary tradition and law. The Bill should be set aside for at least a year if not forever.

    “Three thousand miles , two flat tires and two large hotel bills (one North, one South) later  we have yet to find one person who does not believe that the bill is legalising murder,  We have visited reserves from Black Lake to Mistawasis and many villages and towns. Everywhere we are welcomed and our literature eagerly accepted and read.

    “ At Hafford, Sask the Ukrainian Catholic Priest, Father Ivan  and the Roman Catholic Priest, Father Twin hosted a rally and information night . The hall was full. Mrs. Bev Lamers, Family Life Coordinator said ‘ We have now come full circle. This is the generation that demanded to be in control. First there was contraception, then abortion, now euthanasia.”  Mr. John Caswell sang songs that brought laughter and conviction

    “Seven Bible Schools wanted the Caswells to come for a rally and talk, But their school year is finished so plans are being made for programmes in the fall.  These future Christian leaders of various denominations have a right to be informed and motivated against the violation of The Fifth Commandment : Thou Shalt Not Kill.

    “There are people in various communities in the North West Territories  and the Yukon who want us to come. The Far North has a right to be told the lives of their elders, their youth and themselves are in immediate danger from the medical establishment and the government.  We want to go there but we still have many communities in Saskatchewan to visit.

.    Our Members of Parliament have been told lots of lies. They have been told that if the
Notwithstanding Clause is used  it will open up the Constitution to all kinds of issues. The Notwithstanding Clause, which is to protect us from decisions of the Supreme Court against the will of Canadians and against the Constitution itself, is already in place. It is there and available to be used.  Canadians haven’t had time to  talk to our elected officials on the most dangerous law ever considered .

    “ What’s the rush Prime Minister?  Are you afraid informed Canadians are a threat to your death agenda?

Friday, April 22, 2016

Is Canada Still a Democracy or Not?

For Immediate Release April 22, From Assisted Living not Asisted Dying
 For more information contact Gay Caswell #06-758- 2048

April 22,2016
    STOP! WHOA! BACK UP! Is Canada still a democracy or not!?? If not, how do we get back to the Canada of parliamentry rule?

    Quebec has been killing people in hospitals and in nursing homes for years . Many people in Quebec are and have been opposed to this. Active euthanasia has been and is practised in hospitals throughout Canada. There is no law that permits this. Therefor these murders according to the Criminal Code of Canada are just that. The law has been and is at present: Euthanasia is homicide. Quebec writes up an outrageous law. It is appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court in its present Death March says wonderful! Go for it ! Parliament must rubber stamp this.  WHY??

    Quebec is a province and cannot write a law for the Criminal Code of Canada. That is standing the Constitution on its head. The Supreme Court cannot rewrite the constitution of Canada. That is a radical shift into the tail wagging the dog legislation.  To have a Constitutional change Parliament must pass it then it must be ratified by ALL provinces. This constitutional change has never been approved by parliament and by all the provinces and will never be. The Supreme Court does not have the power to even initiate a constitutional change. This is the first major move into tyranny and against democracy. What the Supreme Court of Canada has done has violated the Constitution, laws and traditions of Canada. The Supreme Court is out of line. So what are the steps to impeach them?

    The Supreme Court says that there must be legislation passed by June 06. People claim that the MP’s will have a free vote outside of party discipline.  What is the point of any vote at all if the Supreme Court says that the MP’s must pass legislation? Is this just a nostalgic show or does Parliament still have the right to run the country? If it doesn’t why have elections? Why have laws on anything ? Why pay the salaries of the MP’s and the Senators ? Why pay the light bills on the Parliament Building? For the tourist trade of Canadiana past?

    On April 14 a draft bill was tabled. What is a draft bill that is tabled? Is this First Reading of an actual bill? If so then why not call it a bill not a draft bill ?  Why was the public not informed that it was going to be tabled ? If this is just a draft that was made public so people can react and suggest changes then why are we not told that it is so. Why is it being treated like a bill that is not only tabled but is going to be passed immediately? Not only that “it must be passed or we will have no law at all.” This one is pervasive and is sheer black mail and concedes power to the Supreme Court that it does not have.

    Why is there so much confusion about the Notwithstanding Clause ? There are knowledgeable people that have been told that the Notwithstanding clause must be approved by Parliament and then ratified by all the provinces? Where did this lie originate?. The Notwithstanding clause is already in the Constitution. It is not a Constitutional Change. Why are people told that the Not withstanding Clause is a great and terrible boogy man that will push us into .... what ?. It will quickly enable us to restore democracy and to protect more Canadians from being murdered as they are now.
    We are a very large country with a sparse, and diverse population. Some of us don’t even know English or French well let alone both. Some of us don’t have phones let alone cell phones, high speed internet et c et c. We are just discovering how the medical establishment has lied to us. Canadians are being murdered en mass and we are expected to keep silent while our elected leaders are forced to rubber stamp approval.  There is a time for Anger    Gay
P.S. Why is the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health always reporting to the United Nations instead of to their fellow Canadians who elected them?  G.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Lying to the Indians

 April 19,2016

    In the last 21 years that we have lived in northern Saskatchewan we have heard many lies of commission and of omission told to northerners by medical personnel. Here is a list, not necessarily in any order or in importance because it is impossible to know what damage a medical lie does.

 LIE: Only Indians get diabetes.
 FACT: Although natives involved in alcoholism  have a propensity for diabetes so do poor blacks. It would seem more realistic to state people on welfare get diabetes but anybody rich or poor could get it.. 

LIE: You can’t have a child after 40 years
FACT: What does CAN’T mean ? You’re not let ( not allowed) or its physically impossible? Many people throughout history and present day have given birth past 40. No one has a right to stop people’s fertility.

LIE: White people accept administered death and do not want to live to be a hundred. When I mentioned that we went to a birthday party for a lady who turned 100 natives were in shock that the lady was white.
FACT: Some people love death and want to impose their hatred of life on others. These people are often manipulators, deceivers and liars.

LIE: There is a really fast Lou Gehrig Disease. People often die within a week after being diagnosed.
FACT: The medical books state that Lou Gehrig or ALS can cause death after 2 to 5 years. No one heard of this fast track until the death gurus started talking about lethal doses for such patients. Some people may be wrongly diagnosed with this disease so they can be killed. A person killed within a week doesn’t have an opportunity  for a second opinion or a prayer for  healing.

LIE: You can only have two C- sections then you have to have your tubes tied.
FACT: What does can’t mean? Not let or its physically impossible? Mrs. Bobby ( Betty) Kennedy had eleven c- sections in the 1950's. Surely medical care has kept up or improved since then. Many women in Sask. have had more than 2 c-sections.

LIE: Your grandfather (, grandmother, mother et c.) died peacefully in the night due to natural causes.
FACT: What may have happened that after depriving your loved one of food then of water the staff gave him a strong dose of morphine to kill him. This is a very common practice in many places among many ethnic and economic groups.

LIE: It is legal to help people die.
FACT: No such law has been passed in Canada although many people especially in Quebec have been killed .  Some medical personnel want us to pass the Assisted Dying Bill to cover up and retroactively make legal what they have been doing illegally. They call it “ having the law in line with the practice.” They used this one to justify legalising abortion.  What must be done is have the practice in line with the law. Many many people are being murdered in Canadian hospitals.

LIE: Assisted dying laws are inevitable and are being passed all over the world.
FACT: In Connecticut, U.S. A. for 3 years there has been assisted suicide bills and each year they are defeated by a wider and wider margin.

In Great Britain, or United Kingdom, our mother country, an assisted dying bill was defeated by 330 against and 115 for.

LIE: No one is ever prosecuted for assisted suicide.
FACT: The doctor of Michael Jackson is in prison for 21 years because he helped him die. In the Criminal Code of Canada euthanasia is still homicide.

This is not a complete list of lies.  By the way the NDP , the pro- marijuana, pro- abortion party was defeated tonight. Gay

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Empty Corridors Where Murder Stalks

Contact: Gay Caswell 306-758-2041
April 18, 2016
    On Thursday, April 14, we were eating a fine meal at Al’s Place, Stoney Rapids and watching CBC. We saw Naziism on Canadian Soil. But it wasn’t called that. It was the evening news and it was called A DIVISIVE BILL. Then we heard how moderate , how necessary, and how inevitable the Assisted Dying Bill was. Then Peter Mansbridge showed us “how it works.” We watched the hand of one living person collapse into the hand of a dying person over and over. We saw evidence of a series of many  murders occurring in a Quebec Hospital.  This was  murder by God’s definition and by Canadian law. No one was arrested.

    Canada has NOT legalised euthanasia NOR assisted suicide. Their legalisation is NOT inevitable nor necessary.  The province of  Quebec has passed such a law. The Supreme Court has made a decision that it’s implementation must  be postponed until June 06. This is not June 06 or past ,yet there has been mass  murders in Quebec hospitals for months including the ones we saw on CBC.  Quebec is a province. It cannot change the Criminal Code of Canada. Criminal Law is federal jurisdiction and has been at least since Confederation . The present law in Canada is EUTHANASIA IS  HOMICIDE. That can continue to be the law of Canada because the will of Canadians want it as such.

     The Supreme Court nor the provincial legislature of Quebec cannot change that, but we can stop the Supreme Court .                                
             How ?
         1.By refusing to cooperate in any way .
        2. By having one or more Members of Parliament say No at First Reading, thus stopping any Assisted Dying Bill from even being tabled. We call it pulling an 'Elijah Harper."
        3. By invoking the Notwithstanding Clause that is entrenched in the Constitution.  A simple bill that states, Notwithstanding the Supreme Court decision there will be no changes concerning euthanasia and suicide in the Criminal Code, will suffice..

    The murder of the hospitalised  victim was done alone yet in a very public place. There was no priest for last rites, not one  family member. No one to hold her hand . No gathering to sit in silence nor say the rosary. It was an isolated, degraded and violent death,

    The patient supposedly gave her consent three times . What proof and under what conditions of duress ? She supposedly told the doctor who was also  her murderer. IF A PERSON IS WILLING TO KILL, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK HE IS NOT WILLING TO LIE?
    Father Le Blanc told us that as chaplin at Victoria Hospital he was not allowed to visit the maternity ward. Why? Because the hospital was afraid that he would influence the patients away from sterilisation and abortion.  Under Assisted Dying there will be no family and community members present, no priest nor pastor, no crucifix on the wall nor rosary at the bedside . These will not be allowed because they will be deemed as interfering with the patients’ choice.  The only choice that will be allowed is the coercion of death.

    NOTWITHSTANDING the death march, Canada can choose life.  Gay

Sunday, April 10, 2016

JUST SAY first reading

For Immediate Release. May be used as a letter to the Editor
For more information contact Gay Caswell at 306- 758-2041

 JUST SAY NO.. At First Reading

There is a lot of confusion, misinformation and disinformation surrounding the Supreme Court Assisted Suicide decision.

Deliberate misinformation: If we don’t have a law about euthanasia everything will be allowed and there will be no restriction whatever.
FACT: We do have a law . In the Criminal Code, it states euthanasia is homicide. Only Parliament can make laws or change them. If the House of Commons does not revoke or change this law , this  is, was and will be the law of the land.

Disinformation: The Supreme Court decision is the same as the Assisted Suicide Report.
FACT:   The Supreme Court did not make a decision on euthanasia which is the deliberate killing of an individual with or without his or her knowledge or permission. It did not state that minors as young as 12 years old can decide to kill themselves. It did not state that doctors must kill or must refer patients to a killer, that all hospitals and nursing homes must be used as murder depots. All of these were added by the Liberal government much against the wishes of people on the euthanasia committee

Disinformation : The Supreme Court has the power to tell the House of Commons when and
what they must pass.
FACT: There is nothing in the Constitution of Canada which is the British North America Act 1867, The Bill of Rights or the Charter of Rights that gives the Supreme Court this power. In 1982 the BNA was transferred from the House of Commons and the House of Lords in London to Canada to facilitate any changes Canada may or may not wish to make. The Charter of Rights could be interpreted by the Supreme Court. This did not mean it had the power to insist on certain laws and give dead lines as to when these must be passed,
We are allowing them to act as if they have power they don’t have.

FACT: The Notwithstanding clause does not have to be ratified by each and every province. A change in the Constitution has to pass the House of Commons, the Senate and then be ratified by every province.  The Notwithstanding Clause is already in the Constitution and does not have to be put there by the consent of every province. It can be used by the House of Commons or by a province whether other provinces agree. Quebec started or does start each law with the Notwithstanding clause. A good plan, incidentally

FACT: A bill has to pass three readings: Ist. Reading is when the bill is tabled. 2nd Reading is when a bill is debated clause by clause , amendments can be made and put to a vote.  3rd reading is the final vote. IF ONE PERSON REFUSES TO ALLOW A BILL TO BE TABLED IT IS STOPPED FROM BEING CONSIDERED. It is dead and is never tabled, A recent precedent is when Elijah Harper of the Manitoba Legislature said no to having the Meech Lake Accord debated circa 1991. He was hailed as a hero. IF ONE OR MORE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT STAND UP AND SAY NO TO THE ASSISTED DYING BILL THE FIRST READING HAS NOT PASSED. It is not tabled; there is no bill and no need for a second or third reading.  Gay

Friday, April 8, 2016


NEWS RELEASE : NEWS RELEASE: May be used as a letter to the Editor
For Immediate Release
Friday , April 08, 2016
From Gay Caswell, coordinator of Assisted Living not Assisted Dying Campaign

    At Cross Lake there has been a series of suicides. The Chiefs of three reserves in  Saskatchewan have declared the situation a crisis as one shocking violent act after another leaves the communities in “ perpetual mourning”. The youth clearly understand the implications of the Supreme Court - Trudeau push for assisted dying. They have been taught to believe that the authority in their lives is the government. The government is saying loudly and clearly murder is okey. If a doctor can kill in a hospital then anything goes. Killing someone or yourself is no more serious than buying a bottle from a bootlegger instead of the government Liquor Board.

    As one Indian Affairs nurse told a priest in northern Manitoba: “ The whole system is designed for death”. On reserves clinics are run by the Federal Government which sets the agenda.  In provincial health care, medical staff at least give lip- service to patient consent. In the North there is no such pretence. Girls and women are pushed into abortion or sterilisation, or given dangerous drugs like depo- provera without their consent or at times without even their knowledge. A common expression of medical staff is “ we’re deciding what we’re going to do with you.” If you think that you should have a say in “what they’re going to do with you” you will be black listed as a trouble maker and will be denied health care to the point of being denied a prescription for a cheap antibiotic when it is clearly needed.
    It is very common in La Ronge Hospital to have a relative sleep on the floor of the patient’s room. It is a very wise precaution .

    For forty years marijuana has been epidemic in the North with few restrictions. If one objects and expects police action you will be branded as a trouble maker that should be kicked out by the “ higher ups”. Since childaren often start doing drugs at 12 years old there are many young adults with mental health issues. The increased acceptance of marijuana by the Federal government will increase the number of people with depression, hallucinations, hostile behaviour, learning difficulties and a host of anti- social behaviour. The report makes it clear that mental illness may make you a candidate for “ capital punishment “, that is a  government approved lethal injection. This cycle of marijuana use that cause mental illnesses that is an excuse for death administration appears to be a thinly disguised genocide programme.

    We are calling for an immediate and complete rejection of the government’s assisted dying report. We are also working to stop the Supreme Court dictatorship.  The House of Commons rejected an euthanasia bill by a huge majority a few years ago.  All Canadians especially we Northerners must be protected from this genocide. 
For more information contact Gay Caswell 306-758-2041