Easter Friday
April 06,2018
Criticising Justin Trudeau has become an international sport. Some of us feel that we can relax while others are doing such a good job. The Tories have a host of politicians brought out of alleged retirement so they can do their part in sinking this dangerous ship of state. An excellent strategy . We missed an opportunity to hear Stockwell Day in Meadow Lake due to other commitments. However we’re glad his Christian commitments are being put to work. But there needs to be a focus on what to do when Justin and the Liberals are defeated. I submit to you the number one priority is to end euthanasia. It can be done simply by invoking the Notwithstanding Clause in the Charter of Rights. Simply put the Parliament can say Notwithstanding, euthanasia remains murder in the Criminal Code. Then we restate this every five years or until Parliamentary supremacy is restored to the pre- 1982 status.
Legalising euthanasia has brought about a reign of terror. Like most reigns of terror it was done by a complete rejection of parliamentary procedure. Justin invoked closure after a few days of debate which was essentially a few hours of debate. Politicians elected by people all over Canada were denied their right to speak and to debate this worse possible law. The competitor would be the Omnibus Bill of 1969 in which the first Trudeau legalised abortion and other anti- family measures.
Legalising euthanasia has turned our hospitals into the most dangerous place in Canada. Because we have state run medicare we can’t escape the danger. Unless families can manage to look after their loved ones at home one can assumr entering a hospital with a serious illness will be a death sentence, that is a murder sentence. If one has diabetes, a condition very common among northerners Trudeau has decided the very expensive equipment necessary to survive doesn’t even get a tax credit. He has given notice that diabetes is no longer a long term condition but a terminal illness. This is consistent with the nefarious Oregon law.
We have come to justify anything as long as Choice is involved. What choice has a person with memory loss got when the hospital or family says “ Granny can’t even recognise her husband. Therefore it’s time for Granny to exit.
What choice has a person in a coma got? What choice has a person undergoing surgery got ? What choice has a handicapt person got? By claiming the issue is the right to choose it immediately assumes if a person can’t give consent or voice opposition that person is so useless that he or she doesn’t have a right to be considered fully human.
In 2011 I was in La Ronge Hospital. That was before euthanasia became legal. I was asked/ pressured every day to have my foot removed. I said “ no” . So they would ask my husband . Everyday about twice a day I was confronted with the issue. I kept saying “no”. Eventually I said “ no” when a doctor entered the room. Finally on December 25 they quit asking.
I am officially not supposed to be allowed medical care in la Ronge because “ I was not polite. I would say no, before the lobbying began. So if your not polite and don’t let them talk you out of your decision you are not qualified for medical care? I didn’t let them remove my foot because I have seen too many friends in the North die as they start the death by inches programme. If you’re not an aggressive articulate fighter you can’t risk being in the hospital. The very ill cannot fight for their life . Therefor the hospital will choose or get someone to choose death for you.
As long as there is euthanasia there is no safe medical care for anyone . Gay
