NEWS RELEASE * NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release April 22, From Assisted Living not Asisted Dying
For more information contact Gay Caswell #06-758- 2048
JMJ
April 22,2016
STOP! WHOA! BACK UP! Is Canada still a democracy or not!?? If not, how do we get back to the Canada of parliamentry rule?
Quebec has been killing people in hospitals and in nursing homes for years . Many people in Quebec are and have been opposed to this. Active euthanasia has been and is practised in hospitals throughout Canada. There is no law that permits this. Therefor these murders according to the Criminal Code of Canada are just that. The law has been and is at present: Euthanasia is homicide. Quebec writes up an outrageous law. It is appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court in its present Death March says wonderful! Go for it ! Parliament must rubber stamp this. WHY??
Quebec is a province and cannot write a law for the Criminal Code of Canada. That is standing the Constitution on its head. The Supreme Court cannot rewrite the constitution of Canada. That is a radical shift into the tail wagging the dog legislation. To have a Constitutional change Parliament must pass it then it must be ratified by ALL provinces. This constitutional change has never been approved by parliament and by all the provinces and will never be. The Supreme Court does not have the power to even initiate a constitutional change. This is the first major move into tyranny and against democracy. What the Supreme Court of Canada has done has violated the Constitution, laws and traditions of Canada. The Supreme Court is out of line. So what are the steps to impeach them?
The Supreme Court says that there must be legislation passed by June 06. People claim that the MP’s will have a free vote outside of party discipline. What is the point of any vote at all if the Supreme Court says that the MP’s must pass legislation? Is this just a nostalgic show or does Parliament still have the right to run the country? If it doesn’t why have elections? Why have laws on anything ? Why pay the salaries of the MP’s and the Senators ? Why pay the light bills on the Parliament Building? For the tourist trade of Canadiana past?
On April 14 a draft bill was tabled. What is a draft bill that is tabled? Is this First Reading of an actual bill? If so then why not call it a bill not a draft bill ? Why was the public not informed that it was going to be tabled ? If this is just a draft that was made public so people can react and suggest changes then why are we not told that it is so. Why is it being treated like a bill that is not only tabled but is going to be passed immediately? Not only that “it must be passed or we will have no law at all.” This one is pervasive and is sheer black mail and concedes power to the Supreme Court that it does not have.
Why is there so much confusion about the Notwithstanding Clause ? There are knowledgeable people that have been told that the Notwithstanding clause must be approved by Parliament and then ratified by all the provinces? Where did this lie originate?. The Notwithstanding clause is already in the Constitution. It is not a Constitutional Change. Why are people told that the Not withstanding Clause is a great and terrible boogy man that will push us into .... what ?. It will quickly enable us to restore democracy and to protect more Canadians from being murdered as they are now.
We are a very large country with a sparse, and diverse population. Some of us don’t even know English or French well let alone both. Some of us don’t have phones let alone cell phones, high speed internet et c et c. We are just discovering how the medical establishment has lied to us. Canadians are being murdered en mass and we are expected to keep silent while our elected leaders are forced to rubber stamp approval. There is a time for Anger Gay
P.S. Why is the Prime Minister and the Minister of Health always reporting to the United Nations instead of to their fellow Canadians who elected them? G.
Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts
Friday, April 22, 2016
Thursday, June 18, 2015
Mulcair wants Douglas Mantle of Destruction.
JMJ
June 18,2015
Mulcair has informed us that he is a “ good” socialist like Tommy Douglas not a
“ bad” socialist like Bob Rae who went from NDP to Liberal. That is like saying Rae
went from Socialist to Socialiste.
So what does he admire most about Douglas? His racism? His Nazii like eugenics? His hatred of- Catholicism? His KKK network? His antagonism to private initiative in business, agriculture, trapping and fishing?
Douglas’ Racism: Douglas was Premier and Minister of Health at the same time. His Health Manifesto stated “ The ill health of the natives is a concern because they mix freely with the whites.” If the natives were isolated and confined they could be left to die of TB et c. He was opposed to natives having the vote but had to allow it because John Diefenbaker was Prime Minister and had given natives the right to vote in Dominion elections.
His Anti- Catholicism: In his Master’s Thesis on “ The Subnormal family” every example of sub- normal was a Catholic, especially Irish Catholic family. He believed that they should be sterilised and put in sex- segregaated institutions or colonies. He came to power in 1944 with the Grand Wizard of the KKK as his campaign manager. The KKK had stirred up fear and hatred against the “ foreigners and Catholic” so he picked up their issue, network and resources to put himself in power while patriotic Catholics were fighting for freedom in Europe. In his medicare plan all health workers would be government financed except staff who were members of religious orders. The Grey Nuns who pioneered hospitals and health care all over the province, beginning at Ile- a- la- Crosse would not be funded.
His Eugenics: Douglas Thesis on “ The Subnormal Family “ was rejected by the Baptist Theological College in Brandon because “it was immoral “ so he pedalled it to McMaster University where it was accepted. Subnormality included not making your own mustard, messy housekeeping, or a family member who had a child out of wedlock. His solution were sterilisation, families divided into gender and put in institutions. He got a Communist from
John Hopkins University to help carry out these plans. He used mental health as a political tool as did the Stalinists. Ukrainians who were telling the truth about the Soviet Union were put in mental hospitals to silence them. People who were on the way to being prosperous farmers or business men or were too outspoken on freedom issues were put in mental hospitals where some were killed by barbaric “ treatment.” Soviet doctors visited institutions such as in North Battleford and made recommendations as to whom should never be released.
His attack on independent business: There wasn’t a business that Douglas didn’t want controlled by the State. He created state owned shoe factories, box factories and many other businesses. He wanted have state own and operated commercial fishing, trapping, agriculture, and many more. His political descendants wasted a lot of time, expertise and tax money on a Sask. Spuds Corporation which failed miserably. Douglas wanted the government to own all farm land but he could not pull it off. However his political legacy was accomplishing that goal by buying up farm land and renting it out. Douglas had a map of what crop would be grown where in Sask but his plan was rejectted.
His claimed fiscal responsibility : Douglas and his socialists told people that crown corporations , that is state owned and operated businesses , would make so much money Saskatchewan people would not have to pay taxes. Instead we had the highest taxes in Canada until recently. His Finance Minister, Fines was one of Canada’s big time swindlers and crooks. He left the province to hide out in the United States until his death. Money confiscated from the estates of inmates in his political prisons called mental hospitals were stolen. If the province had a deficit which it had the figures were hidden in the crown corporations which did not and do not get serious media and public scrutiny.
This is only a small part of the Douglas record. And Mulcaire wants to visit on the whole of Canada Saskatchewan’s sorry past legacy of coercion and waste. Gay
June 18,2015
Mulcair has informed us that he is a “ good” socialist like Tommy Douglas not a
“ bad” socialist like Bob Rae who went from NDP to Liberal. That is like saying Rae
went from Socialist to Socialiste.
So what does he admire most about Douglas? His racism? His Nazii like eugenics? His hatred of- Catholicism? His KKK network? His antagonism to private initiative in business, agriculture, trapping and fishing?
Douglas’ Racism: Douglas was Premier and Minister of Health at the same time. His Health Manifesto stated “ The ill health of the natives is a concern because they mix freely with the whites.” If the natives were isolated and confined they could be left to die of TB et c. He was opposed to natives having the vote but had to allow it because John Diefenbaker was Prime Minister and had given natives the right to vote in Dominion elections.
His Anti- Catholicism: In his Master’s Thesis on “ The Subnormal family” every example of sub- normal was a Catholic, especially Irish Catholic family. He believed that they should be sterilised and put in sex- segregaated institutions or colonies. He came to power in 1944 with the Grand Wizard of the KKK as his campaign manager. The KKK had stirred up fear and hatred against the “ foreigners and Catholic” so he picked up their issue, network and resources to put himself in power while patriotic Catholics were fighting for freedom in Europe. In his medicare plan all health workers would be government financed except staff who were members of religious orders. The Grey Nuns who pioneered hospitals and health care all over the province, beginning at Ile- a- la- Crosse would not be funded.
His Eugenics: Douglas Thesis on “ The Subnormal Family “ was rejected by the Baptist Theological College in Brandon because “it was immoral “ so he pedalled it to McMaster University where it was accepted. Subnormality included not making your own mustard, messy housekeeping, or a family member who had a child out of wedlock. His solution were sterilisation, families divided into gender and put in institutions. He got a Communist from
John Hopkins University to help carry out these plans. He used mental health as a political tool as did the Stalinists. Ukrainians who were telling the truth about the Soviet Union were put in mental hospitals to silence them. People who were on the way to being prosperous farmers or business men or were too outspoken on freedom issues were put in mental hospitals where some were killed by barbaric “ treatment.” Soviet doctors visited institutions such as in North Battleford and made recommendations as to whom should never be released.
His attack on independent business: There wasn’t a business that Douglas didn’t want controlled by the State. He created state owned shoe factories, box factories and many other businesses. He wanted have state own and operated commercial fishing, trapping, agriculture, and many more. His political descendants wasted a lot of time, expertise and tax money on a Sask. Spuds Corporation which failed miserably. Douglas wanted the government to own all farm land but he could not pull it off. However his political legacy was accomplishing that goal by buying up farm land and renting it out. Douglas had a map of what crop would be grown where in Sask but his plan was rejectted.
His claimed fiscal responsibility : Douglas and his socialists told people that crown corporations , that is state owned and operated businesses , would make so much money Saskatchewan people would not have to pay taxes. Instead we had the highest taxes in Canada until recently. His Finance Minister, Fines was one of Canada’s big time swindlers and crooks. He left the province to hide out in the United States until his death. Money confiscated from the estates of inmates in his political prisons called mental hospitals were stolen. If the province had a deficit which it had the figures were hidden in the crown corporations which did not and do not get serious media and public scrutiny.
This is only a small part of the Douglas record. And Mulcaire wants to visit on the whole of Canada Saskatchewan’s sorry past legacy of coercion and waste. Gay
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
The Court: Dangerous and Out of Control
JMJ
April 22,2015
Every second day the Supreme Court has given us another “judgement” to continue to reshape Canada in its own image or at least in the image of the present Liberal Party which is essentially the same thing.
Religous freedom especially freedom to express, teach, act on Christian convictions is to be outlawed. If you repudiate your own former lifestyle as sinful. criminal and exploitative you must keep quiet about it if that former lifestyle involved homosexual acts. If your conversion story and present evangelisation may offend others who are still involved in the lifestyle you will be fined and fined heavily. How does this differ from those former Moslems who are persecuted because they convert to Christianity other than minus the beheadings?
The Supreme Court expects every legislative body at any level to be exempt from religious expression. It states one must be “ neutral” which means one must assume the non- existence of God, Divine Providence, Our Father. A disgruntled councilor in a local Quebec council did not like the prayer before deliberations An obvious solution is he could come five minutes late .But that wouldn’t have given the Court. an excuse to force people to deny their own Faith and the Faith of their Fathers.
The Saskatchewan government immediately stated that the prayer at the beginning of the day’s deliberations would continue. It is highly recommended that every judgement , every where , about anything be treated in the same way until the Court goes back to responsible behaviour . How can one do this? Firstly what powers does the Court have to enforce their nonsense? I have not heard that internment camps for people who lack compliance are in operation...yet. Nor are there special police forces to round up people who pray in public or read Bible verses that offend...yet.
A legislative body can preface every bill by “Notwithstanding the Charter “ and every five years on a slow Friday morning it can renew the Notwithstanding clause on all legislation passed five years ago. If there is legislation that clearly violates human rights such as the former so called hate laws , it can be deleted or amended by parliamentary procedure. Canadian democratic traditions clearly were and are sufficient to maintain a free and responsible country.
There is no possible way that the deluge of judgement coming down from the Court could have been created and issued with meaningful public input and debate. Most people do not know what the issues are before the Court and do not have the authority, finances or legal representation to present their knowledge and convictions. The whole procedure is very much orchestrated against the public. It is designed to push what would never be passed by elected officials
Judgements that claim to help victims or potential victims really are designed to protect vice and criminals, including international crime cartels. Giving drug addicts centres and supplies give drug dealers easy and known access to their market. Drug use is made acceptable and expands the international drug business. Allowing medical use of marijuana expands the marijuana market and all other drug markets. It also assumes that there is medical validity to marijuana. There is no medical justification for pot and much known research to prove that marijuana creates mental illness, causes birth defects on children and grandchildren of users, causes serious lung diseases, breaks down the immune system making other illnesses such as AIDS, cancer, and diabetes including glaucoma worse.
Likewise the Court’s insistence on centres to house the prostitution trade helps the pimps and the customers but makes the prostitutes more vulnerable as their exploitation would be subsidised and given government approval. The Federal government deflected some but not all the harm of this judgement.
And if someone steals, rapes or tortures at gun point, the fact that the criminal is using a gun won’t affect his court time so says the Supreme Court. Enough already. Gay
April 22,2015
Every second day the Supreme Court has given us another “judgement” to continue to reshape Canada in its own image or at least in the image of the present Liberal Party which is essentially the same thing.
Religous freedom especially freedom to express, teach, act on Christian convictions is to be outlawed. If you repudiate your own former lifestyle as sinful. criminal and exploitative you must keep quiet about it if that former lifestyle involved homosexual acts. If your conversion story and present evangelisation may offend others who are still involved in the lifestyle you will be fined and fined heavily. How does this differ from those former Moslems who are persecuted because they convert to Christianity other than minus the beheadings?
The Supreme Court expects every legislative body at any level to be exempt from religious expression. It states one must be “ neutral” which means one must assume the non- existence of God, Divine Providence, Our Father. A disgruntled councilor in a local Quebec council did not like the prayer before deliberations An obvious solution is he could come five minutes late .But that wouldn’t have given the Court. an excuse to force people to deny their own Faith and the Faith of their Fathers.
The Saskatchewan government immediately stated that the prayer at the beginning of the day’s deliberations would continue. It is highly recommended that every judgement , every where , about anything be treated in the same way until the Court goes back to responsible behaviour . How can one do this? Firstly what powers does the Court have to enforce their nonsense? I have not heard that internment camps for people who lack compliance are in operation...yet. Nor are there special police forces to round up people who pray in public or read Bible verses that offend...yet.
A legislative body can preface every bill by “Notwithstanding the Charter “ and every five years on a slow Friday morning it can renew the Notwithstanding clause on all legislation passed five years ago. If there is legislation that clearly violates human rights such as the former so called hate laws , it can be deleted or amended by parliamentary procedure. Canadian democratic traditions clearly were and are sufficient to maintain a free and responsible country.
There is no possible way that the deluge of judgement coming down from the Court could have been created and issued with meaningful public input and debate. Most people do not know what the issues are before the Court and do not have the authority, finances or legal representation to present their knowledge and convictions. The whole procedure is very much orchestrated against the public. It is designed to push what would never be passed by elected officials
Judgements that claim to help victims or potential victims really are designed to protect vice and criminals, including international crime cartels. Giving drug addicts centres and supplies give drug dealers easy and known access to their market. Drug use is made acceptable and expands the international drug business. Allowing medical use of marijuana expands the marijuana market and all other drug markets. It also assumes that there is medical validity to marijuana. There is no medical justification for pot and much known research to prove that marijuana creates mental illness, causes birth defects on children and grandchildren of users, causes serious lung diseases, breaks down the immune system making other illnesses such as AIDS, cancer, and diabetes including glaucoma worse.
Likewise the Court’s insistence on centres to house the prostitution trade helps the pimps and the customers but makes the prostitutes more vulnerable as their exploitation would be subsidised and given government approval. The Federal government deflected some but not all the harm of this judgement.
And if someone steals, rapes or tortures at gun point, the fact that the criminal is using a gun won’t affect his court time so says the Supreme Court. Enough already. Gay
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)