JMJ
June 23,2017
How did “ electoral reform” become an issue that Canadians and even Conservatives supposedly want? The first months of the Justin Trudeau government was even worse than expected. Then Justin attempted to enact a plan to change how we vote. Even the CBC were opposed to it. After spending a million or so of sending out silly post cards et c the plan was dropped. Justin said that he would do it another term.. For the first time I was happy about news from Ottawa. We now knew that Trudeau could be pushed. Since it is unlikely that Trudeau would get a second term I knew that a terrible idea had been shelved permanently... I thought.
Then the financial Chairman of the Tories began to write about it as if we had been denied something. . I wrote to him explaining it is a terrible idea. To date he hasn’t answered my letter. I thought maybe it is because I don’t have a M5W postal code. Senator Dave Tkatchuk told me that you really aren’t IN unless you come from Toronto and have an M5 W. I live where we don’t even have a postal code. We have to use the one for La Ronge, which is 185 km. away.
Trudeau never has any new ideas. He just does what multi- billionaire George Soros tell s him to do. Saves time. George Soros manipulates the electoral process all over the world. He owned a third of the polling station hard ware in the United States. It was proven that these can easily be altered to change the vote. When Colorado had an inexplicable black out at the polling station, the Democrats demanded three more hours of polling time. When we have black outs at the polling station the Liberals stack the ballors and brag about it later at coffee shops. The pro- Marijuana referendum passed in Colorado. I believe that there is a firm connection between that and the polling station black out. George Soros wants legalised marijuana all over the world. Trudeau pushes it . Trudeau uses it. And the George Soros agenda goes marching on.
After Trump’s land side victory the cry to get rid of the Electoral College intensified by the Democrats. Trump won in 49 states . The 50th state is California. The Democrats won there . California has a population as large as the whole of Canada. If there were no Electoral College the United States would have politics as terrible as those in the Culture- of - Death California.
In the U.S.there has been talk of a Constitutional Convention , a Con Con as it is known. Thinking conservatives view this as a terrible idea. Once th Constitution is opened up anything is on the table. A greatly altered and perhaps destroyed United States could be the result. The conservatives who wanted a Balanced Budget amendment in the Constitution could end up with a Democratic Wish List.
When Pierre Trudeau, daddy of Justin, started altering the Constitution by ostensibly bringing it home he turned our country from being ruled by Parliament to being ruled by nine men. We need to restore the parliamentary system to the pre- 1982 Canada. We don’t need any electoral reform to do that. We can start by using the Notwithstanding Clause to get rid of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia.
Canadian football has different rules than American football. To win the Grey Cup you don’t work to change the rules. You know the game and work harder and smarter than the other teams. Then you win
We can’t afford time and money fixing what isn’t broken. Gay.
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Friday, June 23, 2017
Monday, April 18, 2011
NDP going for Silver
JMJ
April 18,2011
As Liberal Leader Ignatieff is in a free fall the NDP and their cohorts in the CBC are hoping for the first time in its existence that the NDP will be able to be the official leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition. They want to campaign on their favourite subject, Government Care. The death of Allan Blakeney has provided them for new opportunities for political myth making. They claim it was really the NDP who brought medicare across Canada. Now the NDP have never been a national party. They have generally plugged away with an Also Ran Third. They have never brought anything across Canada except a wrong headed socialist ideology. Actually it was Prime Minister Conservative John Diefenbaker who nationalised Medicare.
No political party provincially or federally has an anti- Medicare platform. There are those of us who believe in a serious infusion of private medical care as an alternative and expansion of health care. Medicare and medical care are not the same things. It is true that Saskatchewan is the home of Government of Medicare. It is by no means the leader, the example , the preferred place for medical care. That is usually across the border .
Premier Tommy Douglas was both the Premier and the Minister of Health in 1944. He wished to put into political action his eugenics programme outlined in his Master Thesis The Subnormal Family (1933) . He called in a Communist from John Hopkins University, Seigerist to write a report. Seigerest did so putting in Douglas’ favourite themes: The Sterilisation of so called unfit people, unfit to be defined by the elite like Douglas, Mental Hospitals to be used for more control of the unfit. In it is the notorious quote “ the ill health of the Indians are of concern because they mix freely with whites.” Douglas loved the Report and according to biographer McLeod said “ Great!” He should have. It sounded just like his thesis.
Blakeney was the Minister of Health when Douglas made doctors government employees. The Douglas government imported socialist doctors from Britain’s National Health System because there was so much opposition.Douglas said that nuns as nurses, teachers, and administrators working in hospitals like St. Paul’s should not be paid although other similar staff would be. Justice Emmet Hall intervened on behalf of the nuns. The process of taking hospitals away from the nuns began.
Every time the NDP face some serious opposition they tell people Party X will take away medicare and people have an image of granny collapsing on the steps of the hospital with no one to bring her in and help her to a bed. The NDP will rehash their sob story and bogey man at the same time they closed 60 hospitals, concentrating on trashing Catholic Hospitals first. In their recent bout of power it was publicly admitted that about 500 people died of wrong medicine in one year. While the rest of Canada had terrible waiting lists of weeks or months for serious surgery Saskatchewan had waiting lists of over a year. Medical records are parcelled out to other jurisdictions for research without any consideration of the privacy of the people involved. Although there are many false and misleading things in files their information will be used for smear campaigns, political campaigns, and character assassination. No one ever sues because people have a habit of thinking it is too dangerous to cross the government. What will happen?
Will they make me wait for two years if I need heart surgery? Health care is used as a means of eugenics. Native people are pushed into sterilisation and abortion. Healthcare is used as a means of politically rewarding some and politically punishing others. We are denied health care that is available many times.
NDP Premier Romanow liked to explain that Saskatchewan is a sociological experiment. Janice McKinnon, who became Romanow’s Deputy Premier would brag about this in her history class . That is what we are to the NDP , guinea pigs for their theories. If the theories are harmful to the guinea pigs, us, well as long as they are the controllers of the experiment it doesn’t much matter. Unless you think Canadians should be guinea pigs all over the country give the NDP a miss. Gay
April 18,2011
As Liberal Leader Ignatieff is in a free fall the NDP and their cohorts in the CBC are hoping for the first time in its existence that the NDP will be able to be the official leader of Her Majesty’s Opposition. They want to campaign on their favourite subject, Government Care. The death of Allan Blakeney has provided them for new opportunities for political myth making. They claim it was really the NDP who brought medicare across Canada. Now the NDP have never been a national party. They have generally plugged away with an Also Ran Third. They have never brought anything across Canada except a wrong headed socialist ideology. Actually it was Prime Minister Conservative John Diefenbaker who nationalised Medicare.
No political party provincially or federally has an anti- Medicare platform. There are those of us who believe in a serious infusion of private medical care as an alternative and expansion of health care. Medicare and medical care are not the same things. It is true that Saskatchewan is the home of Government of Medicare. It is by no means the leader, the example , the preferred place for medical care. That is usually across the border .
Premier Tommy Douglas was both the Premier and the Minister of Health in 1944. He wished to put into political action his eugenics programme outlined in his Master Thesis The Subnormal Family (1933) . He called in a Communist from John Hopkins University, Seigerist to write a report. Seigerest did so putting in Douglas’ favourite themes: The Sterilisation of so called unfit people, unfit to be defined by the elite like Douglas, Mental Hospitals to be used for more control of the unfit. In it is the notorious quote “ the ill health of the Indians are of concern because they mix freely with whites.” Douglas loved the Report and according to biographer McLeod said “ Great!” He should have. It sounded just like his thesis.
Blakeney was the Minister of Health when Douglas made doctors government employees. The Douglas government imported socialist doctors from Britain’s National Health System because there was so much opposition.Douglas said that nuns as nurses, teachers, and administrators working in hospitals like St. Paul’s should not be paid although other similar staff would be. Justice Emmet Hall intervened on behalf of the nuns. The process of taking hospitals away from the nuns began.
Every time the NDP face some serious opposition they tell people Party X will take away medicare and people have an image of granny collapsing on the steps of the hospital with no one to bring her in and help her to a bed. The NDP will rehash their sob story and bogey man at the same time they closed 60 hospitals, concentrating on trashing Catholic Hospitals first. In their recent bout of power it was publicly admitted that about 500 people died of wrong medicine in one year. While the rest of Canada had terrible waiting lists of weeks or months for serious surgery Saskatchewan had waiting lists of over a year. Medical records are parcelled out to other jurisdictions for research without any consideration of the privacy of the people involved. Although there are many false and misleading things in files their information will be used for smear campaigns, political campaigns, and character assassination. No one ever sues because people have a habit of thinking it is too dangerous to cross the government. What will happen?
Will they make me wait for two years if I need heart surgery? Health care is used as a means of eugenics. Native people are pushed into sterilisation and abortion. Healthcare is used as a means of politically rewarding some and politically punishing others. We are denied health care that is available many times.
NDP Premier Romanow liked to explain that Saskatchewan is a sociological experiment. Janice McKinnon, who became Romanow’s Deputy Premier would brag about this in her history class . That is what we are to the NDP , guinea pigs for their theories. If the theories are harmful to the guinea pigs, us, well as long as they are the controllers of the experiment it doesn’t much matter. Unless you think Canadians should be guinea pigs all over the country give the NDP a miss. Gay
Friday, April 15, 2011
What McVety teaches us.
JMJ
April 15,2011
Do we still have a right to speak out against legislation before , during and after they are passed? Do we still have a right to debate, clarify,inform people of election issues? We have those rights because we are made in the image and likeness of God and He gave us intrinsic or inalienable rights. However judging by the treatment of the President of Canadian Christian College, producer of Word TV, Mr. Charles McVety in Canada those rights are no longer honoured.
His show on Crossroads TV was pulled in December 2010 . It has not been restored but it can be seen on Miracle Channel. Mr. McVety was investigated without his knowledge, without any opportunity for input and defence and without any opportunity for appeal. His intention to pursue legal action is postponed because his wife is ill.
Let’s get the timeline straight. In December the three opposition parties headed by an NDP private member work to quickly pass Gender Rights as an amendment in the Constituion. Few people are aware of the bill and people have not had the time to realise the serious attacks on children and the family. McVety is a man who would effectively explain the impact and make public the danger of the bill. McVety’s programme is pulled.
The three Opposition parties unite under Gender Rights. An election is pending .This bill passed by a majority since the Opposition parties’ votes outnumber the votes of the Conservative Government passes. The Lib- NDP- BQ define this as their election issue. McVety, the Conservatives, and pro-family groups did not decide Gender Rights would be the election issue. The Coalition did and the Coalition and their friends in places like the Anti- Christian Censorship Board, the CRTC are working to make sure that Gender Rights cannot be debated. Ergo there is this prolonged attempt to silence College President McVety.
The decision was made in December but his “crimes” date back to 2004 when Bill C-250 was passed which added sexual orientation to the hate crimes section. He said then “ It is now a crime to speak against homosexuality.” McVety is being punished. McVety has had no recourse to due process or redress. Why is McVety being treated like a criminal, but unlike criminals such as killer Williams he is not allowed a defence or a court. The only conclusion to draw is Act C-250 HAS MADE IT A CRIME TO SPEAK AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY, which is precisely what McVety said in 2004. Not only is speaking against homosexuality being treated like a crime it is a supposed crime that allows no legal protection of the Accused. On this issue Canada now acts like a totalitarian state.
Many people warned that C-250 could be interpreted to allow prosecution of those espousing traditional views of sexuality. They obviously were correct. Otherwise why would Bill Whatcott and his lawyer Tom Schuck be facing a Supreme Court Challenge over Whatcott’s exposure of homosexuals advertising for boys? Why was Judge Bekolay’s use of boys who were recruited in the North silenced in the media? Why were Northerners not told that their boys were being used as fodder for sex orgies by a judge and associates? The obvious answers are (a) it would be more difficult to use boys by others and in the future.(b) it would be bad publicity for the alleged harmlessness of homosexuality (c ) Since Bekolay was the former President of the NDP , Northerners and others might stop voting NDP.
Is it okey to feel a revulsion against killer Williams and pity for his victims, their families and his wife? The law does not require us to feel or not feel things. It only requires us to act or cease from acting in certain ways. Then why can the law now stop us from telling the truth about certain behaviour just in case some people will feel repulsion? There are some major election issues: Repeal Act C-250 Ban the anti- Christian Censorship Board, the CRTC. Please pray for Mr and Mrs.McVety. Gay
April 15,2011
Do we still have a right to speak out against legislation before , during and after they are passed? Do we still have a right to debate, clarify,inform people of election issues? We have those rights because we are made in the image and likeness of God and He gave us intrinsic or inalienable rights. However judging by the treatment of the President of Canadian Christian College, producer of Word TV, Mr. Charles McVety in Canada those rights are no longer honoured.
His show on Crossroads TV was pulled in December 2010 . It has not been restored but it can be seen on Miracle Channel. Mr. McVety was investigated without his knowledge, without any opportunity for input and defence and without any opportunity for appeal. His intention to pursue legal action is postponed because his wife is ill.
Let’s get the timeline straight. In December the three opposition parties headed by an NDP private member work to quickly pass Gender Rights as an amendment in the Constituion. Few people are aware of the bill and people have not had the time to realise the serious attacks on children and the family. McVety is a man who would effectively explain the impact and make public the danger of the bill. McVety’s programme is pulled.
The three Opposition parties unite under Gender Rights. An election is pending .This bill passed by a majority since the Opposition parties’ votes outnumber the votes of the Conservative Government passes. The Lib- NDP- BQ define this as their election issue. McVety, the Conservatives, and pro-family groups did not decide Gender Rights would be the election issue. The Coalition did and the Coalition and their friends in places like the Anti- Christian Censorship Board, the CRTC are working to make sure that Gender Rights cannot be debated. Ergo there is this prolonged attempt to silence College President McVety.
The decision was made in December but his “crimes” date back to 2004 when Bill C-250 was passed which added sexual orientation to the hate crimes section. He said then “ It is now a crime to speak against homosexuality.” McVety is being punished. McVety has had no recourse to due process or redress. Why is McVety being treated like a criminal, but unlike criminals such as killer Williams he is not allowed a defence or a court. The only conclusion to draw is Act C-250 HAS MADE IT A CRIME TO SPEAK AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY, which is precisely what McVety said in 2004. Not only is speaking against homosexuality being treated like a crime it is a supposed crime that allows no legal protection of the Accused. On this issue Canada now acts like a totalitarian state.
Many people warned that C-250 could be interpreted to allow prosecution of those espousing traditional views of sexuality. They obviously were correct. Otherwise why would Bill Whatcott and his lawyer Tom Schuck be facing a Supreme Court Challenge over Whatcott’s exposure of homosexuals advertising for boys? Why was Judge Bekolay’s use of boys who were recruited in the North silenced in the media? Why were Northerners not told that their boys were being used as fodder for sex orgies by a judge and associates? The obvious answers are (a) it would be more difficult to use boys by others and in the future.(b) it would be bad publicity for the alleged harmlessness of homosexuality (c ) Since Bekolay was the former President of the NDP , Northerners and others might stop voting NDP.
Is it okey to feel a revulsion against killer Williams and pity for his victims, their families and his wife? The law does not require us to feel or not feel things. It only requires us to act or cease from acting in certain ways. Then why can the law now stop us from telling the truth about certain behaviour just in case some people will feel repulsion? There are some major election issues: Repeal Act C-250 Ban the anti- Christian Censorship Board, the CRTC. Please pray for Mr and Mrs.McVety. Gay
Sunday, April 10, 2011
what is socialism
JMJ
April09,2011
We have been telling you that Duceppe, Ignatieff and Layton are socialists. It’s time to explain what is socialism.
Firstly, socialism and communism are interchangeable Throughout history they have been used that way. Marx , the author of the Communist Manifesto (1848), began the Ist Socialist International. Engels, who believed women should be public property, began the 2nd International. Lenin, who believed a tiny vanguard must lead the masses, established the 3rd Socialist International. Trotsky, who led the Red Army and wrote the book on Terrorism, established the 4th Socialist International. Sometimes to deceive people socialists, like the NDP, will say we’re not communists, we’re socialists. If you like, you could read The Communist Manifesto and the Regina Manifesto (1933) and see that the aims and goals are the same. Sometimes socialists and communists disagree on tactics and strategy but both are willing to use the electoral process and then switch to coercion. As was said of a Communist leader in an African country: His slogan was one man, one vote. Once in power, it was one man, one vote, once. After seizing power the Communists will do what is necessary to hold on to power including no more elections. Some people feared that Trudeau would stop elections and some people fear that Obama will do the same. In North America we still have not experienced a socialist leader who would stop elections
The leader of the CCF- NDP, former Premier Tommy Douglas had views that might have chilled Rosa Luxenburg, a Feminist Socialist, or Engels who wrote Family, State and Property. Douglas wrote in his Master’s Thesis, The Subnormal Family March 17, 1933 that certain people should be sterilised by force and put in institutions where men and women are separated. Who would be candidates for this? All his examples are Catholics. Candidates for denying reproduction are people who are messy housekeepers, have children outside of marriage, use prepared mustard instead of making their own, who’ve been in trouble with the law. He had complete contempt for Indians. He said that “the ill health of the Indians are a problem because they mix freely with whites.” In other words if we could isolate Indians they could just die off and a problem would be solved. Missionaries on reserves have told me of Douglas’ contempt for Indians. Douglas did not believe that Indians should be allowed to vote. He got on the band wagon when Prime Minister John Diefenbaker was set to give the vote to natives and he knew he couldn’t stop the Prime Minister.
Socialists want power from the top down. There is no avenue in the economy and in people’s lives that they do not want to control. Saskatchewan socialists have attempted to run shoe factories, box factories, pool halls, farm land, city property, potash mining, the fur trade, bottling companies, and housing. All of these ventures ended in failure until they were returned to the private sector, that is to businessmen or a group of businesspeople who know how to do their business. In Canada the Trudeau socialists ruined the oil industry until the National Energy Policy was stopped. There are those who fear that Ignatieff intends to bring back government ownership of the oil industry. Watch out for $3.00 /fuel but then maybe some people won’t deserve to drive.
Ignatieff is still talking about 24 hr. child care. The socialists have always said child care, not day care because they believe that the state should raise children. They also believe that the state should decide who should be allowed to be parents. They think that there should be licenses for those who are fit, according to them, to be parents. For the rest ? See Douglas’ sterilisation programme. Lots of children are sexually abused in day cares and schools. Sexual abuse of children by adults is to these three just one of the options of Gender Rights. No I am not making this up. The three Opposition parties who want to be a Government Coalition voted for Gender Rights which is not equality between men and women in the law but the right to have any kind of sexual expression one likes. If parents and others want to protect children and want to teach and preach morality they, not the paedophiles, will be in trouble with the law. The North has had more than their fill of this already.
Socialism is Not the Catholic teaching on Social Justice. Socialism and social justice are as far removed as feminine and feminism, communion and communism. The Church has always been the great force against socialism. Everywhere socialism has reigned it has attacked the Church. The socialists hate the Church because she teaches the dignity and sancity of each person. Socialists believe that people are fodder for the State, to be used, controlled and dismissed when their usefulness is over. The Church teaches that there are moral laws that cannot be broken. People are made by God and therefore God’s laws are to be obeyed for our happiness and welfare. Socialists believe that morality can be changed at whim. Morality is replaced by personal preference. But some people’s preference will be protected and other people’s preference , like marriage between man and wife, will be attacked. The Church works for people’s freedom by supporting law and justice. Socialists believe that some people deserve legal rights and protection and some do not. An elite, not unlike Lenin’s vanguard, will decide who deserves justice. Christians will not deserve justice.
For your freedom, Gay
April09,2011
We have been telling you that Duceppe, Ignatieff and Layton are socialists. It’s time to explain what is socialism.
Firstly, socialism and communism are interchangeable Throughout history they have been used that way. Marx , the author of the Communist Manifesto (1848), began the Ist Socialist International. Engels, who believed women should be public property, began the 2nd International. Lenin, who believed a tiny vanguard must lead the masses, established the 3rd Socialist International. Trotsky, who led the Red Army and wrote the book on Terrorism, established the 4th Socialist International. Sometimes to deceive people socialists, like the NDP, will say we’re not communists, we’re socialists. If you like, you could read The Communist Manifesto and the Regina Manifesto (1933) and see that the aims and goals are the same. Sometimes socialists and communists disagree on tactics and strategy but both are willing to use the electoral process and then switch to coercion. As was said of a Communist leader in an African country: His slogan was one man, one vote. Once in power, it was one man, one vote, once. After seizing power the Communists will do what is necessary to hold on to power including no more elections. Some people feared that Trudeau would stop elections and some people fear that Obama will do the same. In North America we still have not experienced a socialist leader who would stop elections
The leader of the CCF- NDP, former Premier Tommy Douglas had views that might have chilled Rosa Luxenburg, a Feminist Socialist, or Engels who wrote Family, State and Property. Douglas wrote in his Master’s Thesis, The Subnormal Family March 17, 1933 that certain people should be sterilised by force and put in institutions where men and women are separated. Who would be candidates for this? All his examples are Catholics. Candidates for denying reproduction are people who are messy housekeepers, have children outside of marriage, use prepared mustard instead of making their own, who’ve been in trouble with the law. He had complete contempt for Indians. He said that “the ill health of the Indians are a problem because they mix freely with whites.” In other words if we could isolate Indians they could just die off and a problem would be solved. Missionaries on reserves have told me of Douglas’ contempt for Indians. Douglas did not believe that Indians should be allowed to vote. He got on the band wagon when Prime Minister John Diefenbaker was set to give the vote to natives and he knew he couldn’t stop the Prime Minister.
Socialists want power from the top down. There is no avenue in the economy and in people’s lives that they do not want to control. Saskatchewan socialists have attempted to run shoe factories, box factories, pool halls, farm land, city property, potash mining, the fur trade, bottling companies, and housing. All of these ventures ended in failure until they were returned to the private sector, that is to businessmen or a group of businesspeople who know how to do their business. In Canada the Trudeau socialists ruined the oil industry until the National Energy Policy was stopped. There are those who fear that Ignatieff intends to bring back government ownership of the oil industry. Watch out for $3.00 /fuel but then maybe some people won’t deserve to drive.
Ignatieff is still talking about 24 hr. child care. The socialists have always said child care, not day care because they believe that the state should raise children. They also believe that the state should decide who should be allowed to be parents. They think that there should be licenses for those who are fit, according to them, to be parents. For the rest ? See Douglas’ sterilisation programme. Lots of children are sexually abused in day cares and schools. Sexual abuse of children by adults is to these three just one of the options of Gender Rights. No I am not making this up. The three Opposition parties who want to be a Government Coalition voted for Gender Rights which is not equality between men and women in the law but the right to have any kind of sexual expression one likes. If parents and others want to protect children and want to teach and preach morality they, not the paedophiles, will be in trouble with the law. The North has had more than their fill of this already.
Socialism is Not the Catholic teaching on Social Justice. Socialism and social justice are as far removed as feminine and feminism, communion and communism. The Church has always been the great force against socialism. Everywhere socialism has reigned it has attacked the Church. The socialists hate the Church because she teaches the dignity and sancity of each person. Socialists believe that people are fodder for the State, to be used, controlled and dismissed when their usefulness is over. The Church teaches that there are moral laws that cannot be broken. People are made by God and therefore God’s laws are to be obeyed for our happiness and welfare. Socialists believe that morality can be changed at whim. Morality is replaced by personal preference. But some people’s preference will be protected and other people’s preference , like marriage between man and wife, will be attacked. The Church works for people’s freedom by supporting law and justice. Socialists believe that some people deserve legal rights and protection and some do not. An elite, not unlike Lenin’s vanguard, will decide who deserves justice. Christians will not deserve justice.
For your freedom, Gay
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)