NEWS RELEASE For More Information: ASSISTED LIVING NOT ASSISTED DYING CAMPAIGN
Contact: Gay Caswell 306-758-2041
April 18, 2016
On Thursday, April 14, we were eating a fine meal at Al’s Place, Stoney Rapids and watching CBC. We saw Naziism on Canadian Soil. But it wasn’t called that. It was the evening news and it was called A DIVISIVE BILL. Then we heard how moderate , how necessary, and how inevitable the Assisted Dying Bill was. Then Peter Mansbridge showed us “how it works.” We watched the hand of one living person collapse into the hand of a dying person over and over. We saw evidence of a series of many murders occurring in a Quebec Hospital. This was murder by God’s definition and by Canadian law. No one was arrested.
Canada has NOT legalised euthanasia NOR assisted suicide. Their legalisation is NOT inevitable nor necessary. The province of Quebec has passed such a law. The Supreme Court has made a decision that it’s implementation must be postponed until June 06. This is not June 06 or past ,yet there has been mass murders in Quebec hospitals for months including the ones we saw on CBC. Quebec is a province. It cannot change the Criminal Code of Canada. Criminal Law is federal jurisdiction and has been at least since Confederation . The present law in Canada is EUTHANASIA IS HOMICIDE. That can continue to be the law of Canada because the will of Canadians want it as such.
The Supreme Court nor the provincial legislature of Quebec cannot change that, but we can stop the Supreme Court .
How ?
1.By refusing to cooperate in any way .
2. By having one or more Members of Parliament say No at First Reading, thus stopping any Assisted Dying Bill from even being tabled. We call it pulling an 'Elijah Harper."
3. By invoking the Notwithstanding Clause that is entrenched in the Constitution. A simple bill that states, Notwithstanding the Supreme Court decision there will be no changes concerning euthanasia and suicide in the Criminal Code, will suffice..
The murder of the hospitalised victim was done alone yet in a very public place. There was no priest for last rites, not one family member. No one to hold her hand . No gathering to sit in silence nor say the rosary. It was an isolated, degraded and violent death,
The patient supposedly gave her consent three times . What proof and under what conditions of duress ? She supposedly told the doctor who was also her murderer. IF A PERSON IS WILLING TO KILL, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK HE IS NOT WILLING TO LIE?
Father Le Blanc told us that as chaplin at Victoria Hospital he was not allowed to visit the maternity ward. Why? Because the hospital was afraid that he would influence the patients away from sterilisation and abortion. Under Assisted Dying there will be no family and community members present, no priest nor pastor, no crucifix on the wall nor rosary at the bedside . These will not be allowed because they will be deemed as interfering with the patients’ choice. The only choice that will be allowed is the coercion of death.
NOTWITHSTANDING the death march, Canada can choose life. Gay
Showing posts with label Elijah Harper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elijah Harper. Show all posts
Sunday, April 17, 2016
Sunday, April 10, 2016
JUST SAY NO...at first reading
NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release. May be used as a letter to the Editor
For more information contact Gay Caswell at 306- 758-2041
JUST SAY NO.. At First Reading
There is a lot of confusion, misinformation and disinformation surrounding the Supreme Court Assisted Suicide decision.
Deliberate misinformation: If we don’t have a law about euthanasia everything will be allowed and there will be no restriction whatever.
FACT: We do have a law . In the Criminal Code, it states euthanasia is homicide. Only Parliament can make laws or change them. If the House of Commons does not revoke or change this law , this is, was and will be the law of the land.
Disinformation: The Supreme Court decision is the same as the Assisted Suicide Report.
FACT: The Supreme Court did not make a decision on euthanasia which is the deliberate killing of an individual with or without his or her knowledge or permission. It did not state that minors as young as 12 years old can decide to kill themselves. It did not state that doctors must kill or must refer patients to a killer, that all hospitals and nursing homes must be used as murder depots. All of these were added by the Liberal government much against the wishes of people on the euthanasia committee
Disinformation : The Supreme Court has the power to tell the House of Commons when and
what they must pass.
FACT: There is nothing in the Constitution of Canada which is the British North America Act 1867, The Bill of Rights or the Charter of Rights that gives the Supreme Court this power. In 1982 the BNA was transferred from the House of Commons and the House of Lords in London to Canada to facilitate any changes Canada may or may not wish to make. The Charter of Rights could be interpreted by the Supreme Court. This did not mean it had the power to insist on certain laws and give dead lines as to when these must be passed,
We are allowing them to act as if they have power they don’t have.
FACT: The Notwithstanding clause does not have to be ratified by each and every province. A change in the Constitution has to pass the House of Commons, the Senate and then be ratified by every province. The Notwithstanding Clause is already in the Constitution and does not have to be put there by the consent of every province. It can be used by the House of Commons or by a province whether other provinces agree. Quebec started or does start each law with the Notwithstanding clause. A good plan, incidentally
FACT: A bill has to pass three readings: Ist. Reading is when the bill is tabled. 2nd Reading is when a bill is debated clause by clause , amendments can be made and put to a vote. 3rd reading is the final vote. IF ONE PERSON REFUSES TO ALLOW A BILL TO BE TABLED IT IS STOPPED FROM BEING CONSIDERED. It is dead and is never tabled, A recent precedent is when Elijah Harper of the Manitoba Legislature said no to having the Meech Lake Accord debated circa 1991. He was hailed as a hero. IF ONE OR MORE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT STAND UP AND SAY NO TO THE ASSISTED DYING BILL THE FIRST READING HAS NOT PASSED. It is not tabled; there is no bill and no need for a second or third reading. Gay
For Immediate Release. May be used as a letter to the Editor
For more information contact Gay Caswell at 306- 758-2041
JUST SAY NO.. At First Reading
There is a lot of confusion, misinformation and disinformation surrounding the Supreme Court Assisted Suicide decision.
Deliberate misinformation: If we don’t have a law about euthanasia everything will be allowed and there will be no restriction whatever.
FACT: We do have a law . In the Criminal Code, it states euthanasia is homicide. Only Parliament can make laws or change them. If the House of Commons does not revoke or change this law , this is, was and will be the law of the land.
Disinformation: The Supreme Court decision is the same as the Assisted Suicide Report.
FACT: The Supreme Court did not make a decision on euthanasia which is the deliberate killing of an individual with or without his or her knowledge or permission. It did not state that minors as young as 12 years old can decide to kill themselves. It did not state that doctors must kill or must refer patients to a killer, that all hospitals and nursing homes must be used as murder depots. All of these were added by the Liberal government much against the wishes of people on the euthanasia committee
Disinformation : The Supreme Court has the power to tell the House of Commons when and
what they must pass.
FACT: There is nothing in the Constitution of Canada which is the British North America Act 1867, The Bill of Rights or the Charter of Rights that gives the Supreme Court this power. In 1982 the BNA was transferred from the House of Commons and the House of Lords in London to Canada to facilitate any changes Canada may or may not wish to make. The Charter of Rights could be interpreted by the Supreme Court. This did not mean it had the power to insist on certain laws and give dead lines as to when these must be passed,
We are allowing them to act as if they have power they don’t have.
FACT: The Notwithstanding clause does not have to be ratified by each and every province. A change in the Constitution has to pass the House of Commons, the Senate and then be ratified by every province. The Notwithstanding Clause is already in the Constitution and does not have to be put there by the consent of every province. It can be used by the House of Commons or by a province whether other provinces agree. Quebec started or does start each law with the Notwithstanding clause. A good plan, incidentally
FACT: A bill has to pass three readings: Ist. Reading is when the bill is tabled. 2nd Reading is when a bill is debated clause by clause , amendments can be made and put to a vote. 3rd reading is the final vote. IF ONE PERSON REFUSES TO ALLOW A BILL TO BE TABLED IT IS STOPPED FROM BEING CONSIDERED. It is dead and is never tabled, A recent precedent is when Elijah Harper of the Manitoba Legislature said no to having the Meech Lake Accord debated circa 1991. He was hailed as a hero. IF ONE OR MORE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT STAND UP AND SAY NO TO THE ASSISTED DYING BILL THE FIRST READING HAS NOT PASSED. It is not tabled; there is no bill and no need for a second or third reading. Gay
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)