A Christmas Dream and the Supreme Court

JMJ
Dec.25,2013
    I woke up on Christmas morning and remembered vividly my dream. It wasn’t about sugar plums dancing in our heads.
    Two men were driving a big red truck.  The box had a custom built high walled frame. It was painted the same bright red.  I thought, good for them. They built that well. It’s hard for things to fall out. There was a back entrance with the handle on the outside. I opened it. There was a pretty young woman dressed in a frilly red negligee on a mat. First I thought , I hope she is comfortable . I closed the high tail gate. Then reality hit. These men are driving their business truck. Their business is selling and providing the use of this woman’s body. According to the Supreme Court’s latest rewrite of Canada this should be perfectly legal. They expect the House of Commons to write and pass a law that would make this perfectly acceptable. Maybe the entrepreneurs would have to buy a peddler’s licence when they enter small towns. But one thing for sure this woman is off the streets. Therefore she is, according to the Supreme Court ,“ protected and safe.”
    There was a reason I was supposed to remember and write about this dream. But on Christmas Day? Precisely. God became man” to save us all from Satan’s power when we had gone astray.” The Supreme Court of Canada is acting like Satan’s Power and wants us all to go astray.
    The Supreme Court has ruled that the Canadian tax payer has a duty to provide centres where heroin addicts in the process of killing themselves, stealing to keep their habit going , infecting others while he sells his body , ripping off the welfare system must have clean disposable needles and a place to use them.
    The Supreme Court has ruled free speech entails that one must present both sides according to some people’s interpretation ( I have read that one and in my opinion it is being misinterpreted, but hey, the lawyers and Human Rights Commissions are the only ones allowed to claim literacy.) So MACLEANS switches sides ad nauseum week by week until it becomes unbearable to read. Sask. Pro Life thinks they need to publish a pro- contraception article. The only side that is not presented is there is such a thing as Truth and people have a right and duty to express their convictions. Let their opponents buy their own ink.
    The Supreme Court has ruled contrary to a motion passed on the definition of family and marriage that people of the same sex have a right to impose a mockery of marriage on clergy and society. Nothing in the Charter of Rights says this. It says rights must equally apply to both men and women. That means when people have a right to due process in law that includes Ms. Pamela Wallen not just Mr. Tony Merchant. That means that when people have a right to Life that includes Muslim women who sass back their husband.
    In the 1956 Canadian Encyclopedia there is a very good section on Canadian government incluing a picture of Her Majesty  Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister John Diefenbaker.  The article states clearly that Parliament is supreme. Laws are passed by people who are elected by the people of Canada. It was a very good system and served us well. Two socialists helped Pierre Trudeau, another Socialist/ Communist to change all that. Another Socialist, Allen Blakeney  who had enough respect for democracy and law insisted on a Notwithstanding Clause that would save us from being ruled by a hedonist or confused
 eleven person autocracy. We can restore democracy and common sense. We don’t need an armed revolution. We simply apply the legal tools available and let the democractic process do the rest.
    What the Supreme Court has said in reality is Prostitution should be legal. Boys and girls of 16 years have a “right” to be exploited, abused, maimed and possibly killed in the “safety”  of a brothel. The Canadian tax payer must pay for these brothels as well as the ensuring health epidemics of patrons, the  exploited and any contacts. Canada needs to be saved from the  Supreme Court which needs to be saved from itself . The key is the Elected using the Notwithstanding Clause in their laws. Thank- you Mr. Blakeney. God rest your soul. Gaye

The Duffy , Wallin non-issue

JMJ
Oct.22, 2013
    As we were travelling South this summer we stopped at Thomson’s Camps where the breakfast is good and the tea is terrible. With coffee strained tea I was forced to watch CBC on wide screen TV.  I left the restaurant and it wasn’t the tea that did it. At La Ronge A& W  I phoned CBC Regina and protested their treatment of Pamela Wallin, their former employee who was fired for being too conservative. I encountered perfect Female Cat. The CBC witch was in orgasmic throws of pure Jealous Spite. This Wallin story had nothing to do with news, facts or relevance. It was about CBC snits attacking a female who got a position that they didn’t get and did, not with their endorsement, but despite them
    CBC used the term “ questionable “ expenses, not proven wrong, “questionable.” It stated that she paid back “ questionable expense” then went on to show numbers not of money she owed but of money she repaid when it was “questionable “ that she needed to pay anything. Their favourite Angus somebody ranted about “ the taxpauer money she ripped off.” She didn’t rip off anybody. She paid back expenses that were never proven to be wrong.  CBC is the most blatent example of a politically partisan boondoggle at taxpayer’s expense. It took me 3 days to find out who won the Stanley Cup . CBC is not the voice of Canada but the voice of Post - Feminist Era Betrayal and Bitterness.
    Did the Liberals find any burning issues in their constituencies this summer? .Apparently not. They really believe that  the job of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition is  demanding to know if the Prime Minister knew that the then Chief of Staff had lent money to a Senator to pay for another questionable ,not proven overpayment on expenses. What if the Prime Minister had known? What difference would it make?. Somebody allegedly owes some money. He repays  money that he may or may not owe. He pays it by borrowing money from a friend. The friend may or may not have told the Prime Minister . So what ? There is no news story here, no scandal, no proven wrong doing, no criminal act , not even a proven unethical act. Move on please.
     There is one issue about the Senate. The Tories have a majority in the Senate.  The Liberals- NDP which of course includes the CBC do not like that the Tories have a majority in the Senate. The Lib-NDP do not like that the Senate eventually may be elected , effective and with equal representation from each province. No one questioned how or who spent taxpayer money when the Senate was a retirement home for Liberal bagmen.  As usual what the Socialists can’t control, they want destroyed.
    There is one issue about Senators Wallin and Duffy. They are conservative journalists. The Left Establishment has a special hate for anyone who questions their Group Think Monopoly. They know nothing is more dangerous than an honest writer who is willing to think for himself. They think they should be silenced.  They even sometimes work at getting them put in jail. Have you heard of conservative publisher Lord Conrad Black? Or sometimes they work at getting them killed.  The Left do not always get their way. That is good news. Gay